By Tom DunlapWhat was once an easily avoided subculture of needy and annoying online souls is now a growing part of the social and media landscapes, with tentacles reaching into the operations of major corporations, newspapers, networks, and political campaigns. Suddenly, our skies are dark with brightly colored cartoon birds.Here's what I tell people like Mr. Zaitchik (whom I thank for a well-written, if misguided, piece.) I don't give a tinker's damn about Tweets from Oprah, Ashton Kutcher, Brooke Burke (OK, maybe I would check those, actually), or any other "star."
... There is evolutionary logic to the Twitter surge.
The progression has been steady, from blogs to RSS feeds to Facebook. But Twitter brings us within sight of an apotheosis of those aspects of American culture that have become all too familiar in recent years: look-at-me adolescent neediness, constant-contact media addiction, bird-like attention-span compression, and vapidity to the point of depravity. When 140 characters is the ascendant standard size for communication and debate, what comes next? Seventy characters? Twenty? The disappearance of words altogether, replaced by smiley-face and cranky-crab emoticons?
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Twitter Backlash Grows in Santa Cruz.
TrackBack URL for this entry: https://swarm.jupitermedia.com/mt-tb.cgi/7902
Hmmm. So what makes Twitter better for you than email, RSS feeds, text messages, online forums, Facebook/MySpace/Advogator/etc-ad-nauseum or even old-fashioned phone calls? I'm in the 'oh crud, just one more manifestion of attention-deficit disorder and a total inability to be alone ever' camp :)
Hey Arnold,
Thanks for the note. Heck, I love being alone!
Anyway, Twitter has a huge convenience factor. That Semantic Web Twitter group is really focused, more so than a Facebook page. For some reason, I never found RSS feeds all that convenient. And I get way too much email. Still too much spam getting through.